I am hoping for these theoretical wishes to come true. ![]() I hope that it will be possible to upgrade the supervisor to enable the use of two single-width 2x 100Gbit network modules (NM) in the 9300, or even to enable the use of future security modules requiring more than two 40Gbit links to the internal switch fabric. These models are born with supervisors to make them modular, like several other high-end Cisco platforms. We were first introduced to Firepower 9300 and subsequently to the Firepower 4100, primarily focused at data center deployments. I will start from the top down, with the best performing firewalls continuing to the least performing firewalls and why Cisco is replacing these.Ī couple of years ago Cisco released a new architectural platform going away from the well-known ASA platform. This is because they differ too much from the architectural evolution of Cisco firewalls and will not help with understanding why Cisco is choosing this specific path for the Firepower 2100 series. I am about to take you on a tour of the last few generations of Cisco firewall and their architecture to give insight in why the Firepower 2100 is not at all like the Firepower 4100 and not like a ASA5516-X either.įirst, I would like to make a note of the lack of presenting the architecture of the ASA5505 and ASA5585-X even though they are still being used today. ![]() The program has been running for over four years and has earned two industry awards as an industry best practice. Dennis Perto is a Cisco Champion, an elite group of technical experts who are passionate about IT and enjoy sharing their knowledge, expertise, and thoughts across the social web and with Cisco.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |